Top Climate Scientists Slam Global Warming “So-Called Evidence” as “Misrepresentation, Exaggeration, and Outright Lying.”
Two top-level American atmospheric scientists have dismissed the peer review system of current climate science literature as “a joke.” According to Emeritus Professors William Happer and Richard Lindzen, “it is pal review, not peer review”. The two men have had long distinguished careers in physics and atmospheric science. “Climate science is awash with manipulated data, which provides no reliable scientific evidence,” they state. No reliable scientific evidence can be provided either by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), they say, which is “government-controlled and only issues government-dictated findings.” The two academics draw attention to an IPCC rule that states all summaries for policymakers are approved by governments. In their opinion, these summaries are “merely government opinions.” They refer to the recent comments on climate models by atmospheric science professor John Christy from the University of Alabama, who says that, in his view, recent climate model predictions “fail miserably to predict reality.” Read the report
Ok, if we are in a good, settled, mental state, we don't need to be a scientist to know we shouldn't rely on any information whatsoever that is fed to us through scientists sponsored by our mostly corrupt governments, who themselves are also sponsored by worldly billionaires, who are more concerned with material values rather than a spiritual existence. Why? Well, quite simply, they are pushing their own agendas. The governments that are selling coal and other so-called harmful fossil fuels are more often than not climate change deniers, while the green energy pushers, solar and wind energy, etc are screaming 'CLIMATE-CHANGED!, from the highest rooftops.
It's political madness, especially when you realize the same governments are destroying our atmosphere with massive amounts of toxic rocket emissions and earlier nuclear bomb testing which we were warned about 65 years ago, no less. And our mighty military-industrial-complex has been finding ways to weaponize the weather since the day the Space Race began in 1957, vice president Lyndon Johnson admitted it—In the early 60s, JFK, and Lindon Johnson realized they had to find a way to control the sun's power affecting the weather here on Earth, Johnson apparently had more sinister ideas and wanted to use the weather as a weapon. A prominent scientist at the time, Harry Wexler who was on JFK's team warned the US government in 1962 that increased pollution from rocket exhaust was doing terrible things to the atmosphere, however, the military intervention made sure the experiments continued, attacking the ozone layer over your enemies nation was appealing to the military.
So, my advice to the two Emeritus Professors, William Happer and Richard Lindzen you are correct when you claim that “Climate science is awash with manipulated data, which provides no reliable scientific evidence,” bravo!
However, climate change is very real, it's not rocket science—pardon the pun. Happer and Linzen refer to the recent comments on climate models by atmospheric science professor John Christy from the University of Alabama, who says that, in his view, recent climate model predictions “fail miserably to predict reality.” This is very true, but that's because the extreme weather events happening now around the world are so extreme and brutal, that the supercomputers which cost millions of dollars, by the way, can't come anyway near showing what is actually happening around the world. They can't predict what is happening to our climate because the reality of the extremity is too fast for even the most advanced models.For instance, shocked climate scientists are wondering how even worst-case scenarios failed to predict such furnace-like conditions which hit Canada last spring when an incredible, record-breaking heatwave hit Canada and the northwest US even before summer had officially arrived. Johan Rockström, the director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, said the recent extreme weather anomalies were not represented in global computer models. We have been taken by surprise! And so have our governments.