As I finish writing this post and upload it to the world-wide-web, the article will send alarm bells ringing simultaneously, prompting algorithms to send my article to alphabet organisations around the world at the speed of light. I am not trying to "big" myself up, or promote my own self-importance on people or anything like that, no, on the contrary, the situation I find myself in, in this great scheme of things is exactly the same as almost 8 billion others. The algorithms are there for when people like me step out of "place."
No, the reason my post will be thoroughly checked over by certain organisations is that artificial intelligence, called algorithms are watching our every move on the net, the algorithms are programmed to "red-flag" millions of names, phrases and words used by people every day on the internet. "They," say it is to monitor terrorism, which sounds like a good thing but the monitoring goes much deeper than terrorism.
Today, I'm going to write about the Rockefeller Foundation, amongst others, "BUZZZZ!" There it goes, now we have the algorithm's attention, I will begin?
Back in May 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation released a paper called; "Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development." Although the paper was written twenty-one years ago it predicts what is happening to our world in 2021 with the accuracy of a Biblical prophet!
The Rockefeller Foundation produced the report covering four possible "scenarios" that could happen in the future and one of these "scenarios" happened almost exactly ten years later in 2020.
One of the scenarios covered in "Scenarios the Future of Technology and International Development" was a global pandemic and the Rockefeller Foundation's version of events was incredibly similar to what has happened in the real world in the last one and a half years.
The report claims in the first of the four scenarios called, "Lock Step" that: Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the "virus streaked around the world," infecting nearly 20 per cent of the global population.
It goes on; International mobility of both people and goods would screech to a halt. Normally bustling shops and office buildings would be empty for months, devoid of employees and customers. National leaders around the world would impose airtight roles and restrictions from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks.
The incredibly accurate paper goes on to detail how "the powers that be" would never let that "imaginary" crisis end.
For instance, even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.
At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.
The paper even goes on to describe how China's government's quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens as well as its near-hermetic sealing off all borders saved millions of lives enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery. And all this was written in 2010? Hmmm.
More Pandemic Porn!
Back to the future 2003!
This brings me to Anthony Fauci,” "BUZZZ!" We got the algorithm's attention again!
Remember him? DR. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) and Chief Medical Advisor to the President.
Dr David Martin is the CEO and inventor of Linguistic Genomics. In the early 2,000’s his company was responsible for bringing down the largest tax frauds in the history of the US. His company maintained a series of inquiries into every individual, every organisation and company that was involved in anything that blurred the line between biological and chemical weapons or crossed that line in more than 165 countries.
His work has been the subject of an internationally awarded documentary, “Patent Wars” which highlights his work on the reform of the global innovation system which Dr Martin has developed into a fraud detection tool which he has used to expose some "remarkable dodgy dealings" regarding patents linked to Covid-19.
In 1999 there were a million patents digitalised by IBM. These million patents were the first time human innovation had been put into an electronic digital searchable format. Dr David Martin took that information and devised a very simple exercise using his own Linguistic Genomics technology. He stumbled on the “horrific assessment” that approximately one-third of all patents filed in the United States were “functional forgeries,” meaning while they had linguistic variations they actually covered the same subject matter.
According to Dr Martin, in 1999 “patents” on a “coronavirus” started showing up on the IBM list and thus began his rabbit trail. In March 2003 panic gripped Hong Kong with the Sars outbreak and the CDC realised they had found a virus that could be “easily manipulated” into something very very valuable and in the same year the CDC decided to patent it. “Anthony Fauci,” remember him? Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) and Chief Medical Advisor to the President and Ralph Baric, Distinguished Professor at the UNC-Chapel Hill University along with other distinguished people at the CDC were at the hub of this story from 2003 to 2006. They controlled “100%” of the cash flow which they used to build the empire around the mighty industrial complex of the coronavirus. On April 25th 2003, the US CDC filed the patent, number “US7776521B1” on the “coronavirus transmitted to humans.”
However, under 35 U.S.C. law, (The Code of Laws of the United States of America) “nature is prohibited from being patented.” Either the Sars, Coronavirus is manufactured, (manmade, not natural) or it is natural, therefore making a patent on it highly illegal but they went ahead anyway. In the Spring of 2007, the CDC filed a petition with the patent office to keep their application confidential and private. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) had a moral, social and potentially legal reason to object to the Coronavirus research but the letter which was sent to the researchers essentially said you’re receiving notice that we are telling you to “STOP, ” however, we are going to “qualify what stop means,” which is "“KEEP GOING”" but when the heat gets hot in 2014, "offshore the research", fund the "Wuhan Institute of Virology" to do the stuff which is getting a little edgy with respect to its morality and illegality. Then, when the “SHTF” the US can say the Chinese did it and the Chinese can say the US did it and the fact is both of them are almost telling the truth. Which is of course exactly what did happen!
How did they know the shit would hit the fan 17 years before it did?
By 2017, the virus was in the facility in Wuhan China and guess what? The US biosafety experts warned that the "virus" could 'escape' the facility in WUHAN. (“YOU DON’T SAY!”) It could be the scenario of a Hollywood Blockbuster but, could the mysterious Coronavirus which exploded in China and other parts of the world in just the first 25 days of 2020 have accidentally leaked from China's only lab in China, designated for studying dangerous pathogens like SARS and Ebola? It had happened before, in 2004, a SARS virus 'leaked' from a lab in Beijing. It seems highly coincidental that The Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory is the only lab in China designated for studying dangerous pathogens and is the city where the mysterious coronavirus began!
The Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory is the only lab in China designated for studying dangerous pathogens like SARS and Ebola. On December the 24th 2019, laboratory bosses in Wuhan accepted an annual management review with the object to ensure the implementation of the management principles and quality objectives of the laboratory safety system, and to maintain the suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the system. A week later on the day the US Embassy was attacked in Iraq, The World Health Organization (WHO) was alerted by Chinese authorities of a string of pneumonia-like cases in Wuhan, a city of 11 million people. Patients were quarantined and work began on identifying the origin of pneumonia. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identified a seafood market suspected to be at the centre of the outbreak. The market was closed on Jan 1, 2020. According to The Daily Mail, on its January 2018 opening, biosafety experts and scientists from the US expressed concerns that a virus could escape the lab. In 2004, a SARS virus 'leaked' from a lab in Beijing.
In January 2021 after weeks of poking around in Wuhan, a team of inspectors from the World Health Organisation were still unable to answer the overarching question of where COVID-19 had come from, however, they were doubtful it had escaped from the Wuhan lab. Here's a thought, why didn't they just ask Anthony Fauci and the CDC? On the 9 of February 2021, the BBC reported: International experts investigating the origins of Covid-19 have all but dismissed a theory that the virus came from a laboratory in China. Peter Ben Embarek, the head of the World Health Organization (WHO) mission, said it was "extremely unlikely" that the virus leaked from a lab in the city of Wuhan. He said more work was needed to identify the source of the virus. The investigation could now focus on SouthEast Asia, one expert said. The WHO team is currently at the end of their investigation mission.
Wuhan, in China's central Hubei province, is the first place in the world that the virus was detected in 2019. Since then, more than 106 million cases and 2.3 million deaths have been reported worldwide. Dr Embarek told a press conference the investigation had uncovered new information but had not dramatically changed the picture of the outbreak. Experts believe the virus is likely to have originated in animals before spreading to humans, but they are not sure how.
Back to the future 2019
According to i24NEWS, the US government reportedly gave Israel an advanced warning over the emerging threat the coronavirus posed in China around mid-November 2019. According to Israeli broadcaster Channel 12, US intelligence agencies became aware of the danger posed by COVID-19 which later battered the central city of Wuhan in China's Hubei province. The information was then handed over to the White House, “which did not deem it of interest,” according to Channel 12.
Despite the Trump administration's dismissal of the information, US intelligence decided to warn its close allies of the contagious disease, specifically NATO and Israel. Channel 12 reported that the impact of COVID-19 on Israel and the larger region was discussed at length by Israeli military officials. “Still in November, the IDF held a first discussion regarding what impact this unknown disease would have were it to reach the Middle East. How would we be affected? How would it affect our neighbours? As you can imagine, the information [on the virus outbreak in China] did not remain solely with the IDF. The news shortly "reached Israel’s decision-makers and the Health Ministry," where ultimately “nothing was done,” according to Channel 12.
Equally, damming, if the US knew about the outbreak as far back as November 2019, why did China's president, Xi Jinping wait until December 31, 2019, to announce to the world the threat of a pandemic? Chinese Health officials informed the WHO about a cluster of 41 patients with mysterious pneumonia, however, Chinese officials only released the news because of a report on a popular forum from a group of whistleblowers that had tried to alert the world.
So on January the 1st, 2020, around two months after the US, China and Israel governments and NATO knew what was unfolding, China decided to tell the world the dangers of the new deadly coronavirus pandemic.
Things just don’t seem to add up!
Back in November 2020, I did some research on the virus myself. As the world was approaching 60 million covid-19 cases and 1.5 million deaths I had some underlying doubts as to just what was really going on out there. Strange stories were circulating, things were not adding up, statistics were not agreeing with the so-called facts. For instance, my 90-year-old father, who at the time was very sick and in the hospital with a bladder infection, caught the virus while in the hospital. The most fragile, weak and immunity compromised man you could possibly think of didn't have one symptom of this "killer" disease he didn’t even know he had the virus, he was asymptomatic, I’m happy to tell you he is back home and doing rather well for a man his age. His 90-year-old wife with heart disease came down with the virus and although poorly she was never in any danger. Elon Musk tested both positive and negative twice in one day? Despite all the fearmongering the facts are not stacking up with the start, in the UK anyway. In the UK, Boris Johnson and his government would have us believe the virus was running through the British Isles totally out of control in November 2020, but the stats gave us an entirely different story.
In July 2020, a report commissioned by Chief Scientific Adviser Sir Patrick Vallance, scientists estimated that there could be 119,000 deaths in the UK if a second spike coincided with a peak of winter flu. A report in the Daily Mail on the 20th of November 2021, showed the incredible discrepancies we were being fed. By November 20th a second spike had arrived and coincided with a peak of winter flu but the actual figure stood at 54,286 – less than half that Sir Patrick Vallance had estimated. In fact, the second peak seems to have passed, there was an average of 22,287 new infections a day, down from 24,430 the week before on the day of the Daily Mail report. In mid-September, Sir Patrick made the terrifying claim that the UK could see 50,000 new coronavirus cases a day by mid-October unless more draconian restrictions were introduced. Yet we have never gotten near that figure.
Death predictions and reality.
The Public Health England/Cambridge, led by Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty estimated by late November England would be suffering more than 4,000 deaths a day from the virus, the true data is expected to be under 500, still terrible but a long long way from Mr Whitty’s estimate. We keep on hearing of hospitals not coping with dying patients lying on beds in corridors. Last month, October 2020, the UK government experts published a chart that suggested hospitals were severely under strain and at breaking point. However, according to the Daily Mail’s report, only 13% of the UK's hospital beds were actually occupied by patients with Covid-19 that week. The average hospital bed occupancy across England, Whales and Northern Ireland in 2020 were actually slightly less than at the same time last year!!! “HOW CAN THAT BE EVEN POSSIBLE?” Once again, "the number of NHS hospital beds occupied in England in mid-November was lower than last year's average." According to the Daily Mail, on November the 5th the most recent data available, there were actually 1,300 fewer patients in hospital beds than last year's November average. Now get this, on November the 8th, the number of occupied hospital critical beds across the British Isles was actually lower than the 5-year average from 2015 to 2019. Nooooooo! The huge purposely built Nightingale hospitals which were speedily erected earlier in 2020 to help combat the covid "onslaught" have NEVER been more than 1.23% occupied.
Of those who have died in England up to November 2020, 95% of them had at least one serious pre-existing serious medical condition. Just 42 people under the age of 40 have died from covid without a pre-existing medical condition.
Were more people dying than last year up to November 2020?
Yes slightly more is the answer but there is a good reason for that. In the week to November 6th, overall deaths in England stood at 11,812 which is 14.3%, 1,481 higher than the 5-year average. The death rate would be significantly lower, however, for the fact that record-breaking heat waves this summer killed an estimated 2,566 excess deaths which pushed up the 2020 total significantly! According to the latest Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures – for October 2020 – in spite of all the Covid-19 deaths, the average death rate in the over-75s was significantly lower this year than it was last October – 6,901.7 per 100,000 people, compared with 7141.7 for last year.
Another covid paradox was the fact that people would arrive at empty airports after being in lockdown for weeks, or even longer and would then be expected to cram themselves like sardines into a passenger jet after being told by the “experts” it was simply ok to fly? How? Am I missing something? My next-door neighbour is an airline pilot and he told me the air in the passenger carriage is cleaned, “after” the journey. Mask or no mask flying during a pandemic sounds very dangerous to me.