Sunday, 12 January 2020

Did NASA know back in 1958 our Sun and not CO2 was causing climate change? Christmas Eve, 1957 our Sun had 503 sun-spots, scaring the science community resulting in President Eisenhower to authorise the opening of NASA

Coincidence? Across the top of the stamp is the wording ‘International Geophysical Year 1957-1958,’ arranged in two lines, and across the bottom is ‘U.S. Postage 3c.’ All the lettering is in white-face Gothic. Philosophy of Science Portal

It is undeniable, climate change is real, however, Liberals, the establishment, most of the world leaders and leading media outlets want us to believe the reason behind climate change is the fault of human beings using fossil fuels and our high use of CO2, Carbon Dioxide. They claim Carbon dioxide absorbs more sunlight passing through it than oxygen or nitrogen, and therefore becomes hotter, much like a black substance like tar becomes hotter than a white one like concrete. This has the effect of increasing the overall temperature of the Earth. as we add more carbon dioxide to the air, the temperature will continue to rise. Actually, the records of temperature and CO2 over the past 650,000 years indicate that Earth's temperature always rises first, followed by a rise in Carbon Dioxide. Published papers, clearly show it is always temperature which rises first by at least several hundred years and then the carbon dioxide responds. 
The records of temperature and CO2 over the past 650,000 years indicate that Earth's temperature always rises first, followed by a rise in Carbon Dioxide. Graph izzit.org

In their seminal paper on the Vostok Ice Core, Petit et al (1999) note that CO2 lags temperature during the onset of glaciations by several thousand years. They also observe that CH4 and CO2 are not perfectly aligned with each other. At the onset of glaciations, the temperature drops to glacial values before CO2 begins to fall suggesting that CO2 has little influence on temperature modulation at these times.
Credit WUWT

Credit NASA

 Ladies and gentlemen, if I was to tell you, major earthquakes, volcano eruptions, floods, cyclones and natural disasters, all mirror that graph above and they all spike after Christmas Eve and Christmas Day 1957, you would come to the conclusion our Sun is causing climate change/disaster change and not humans, see graph below.

Every graph, they all provide the same data. Credit Wikipedia.

According to Royal Observatory of BelgiumChristmas Eve and Christmas Day, 1957, our star had a record-busting, 503 sunspots, see chart section below.
Credit Royal Observatory of Belgium

On Christmas Eve and Christmas Day, 1957 the Sun had 503 sun-spots, this crazy number of sun-spots lasted for 5 days, our Sun was wild, which scared the science community at the time resulting in President Eisenhower to authorise the opening of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in July 1958. It was the year 1958, to be precise, when NASA first observed that changes in the solar orbit of the earth, along with alterations to the earth’s axial tilt,
In the year 2000, NASA did publish information on its Earth Observatory website about the Milankovitch Climate Theory, revealing that the planet is, in fact, changing due to extraneous factors that have absolutely nothing to do with human activity. But, again, this information has yet to go mainstream, see the report on Earth Observatory Coincidently, Milankovitch died in 1958.


The 2 screengrabs represent Global temperatures from 1880 to 2018, however, the video below shows temperatures remained relatively stable until the late 50's when a spike in temperatures began, see video below


This colour-coded map in Robinson projection displays a progression of changing global surface temperature anomalies from 1880 through 2018. Higher than normal temperatures are shown in red and lower than normal temperatures are shown in blue. The final frame represents the global temperatures 5-year averaged from 2014 through 2018. Scale in degree Celsius.
History of global temperature since the mid-nineteenth century through 2018 compared to the 1981-2010 average from four analysis teams: NOAA (red), NASA (tan), the University of East Anglia (pink), and the Japan Meteorological Agency (orange). In the background is an image of Earth on August 3, 2018, from NOAA's DSCOVR satellite.

On Christmas Eve 1957 The Amsterdam Evening recorder reported the Missing British Sub "Safe." Search Called Off 

The Admiralty said it was possible unusual sunspot activity over the past two days might have blacked it out. Gigantic explosions on the sun have bombarded the earth with cosmic rays, interfering with communications. 

LONDON UP)—The Admiralty today called off a search for the British submarine, Acheron sighted safe in gale swept seas after being feared lost for nearly six hours. The British minesweeper Coquette radioed three hours after the Admiralty reported the Acheron overdue that she had made "visual contact" with the sub. Acheron Sighted in Gale-Swept Arctic Sea by Minesweeper; Failure of Communications System Made Contact With Admiralty Impossible; Was Unreported Since Wednesday When It Made Trial Dive her communications system was out of order. The Acheron then proceeded to Iceland. The search started after the Acheron failed to make her routine radio report this morning.

The Acheron dived two days ago during arctic trials in the Denmark Strait between Iceland and Greenland and should have reported by radio at 10:05 a.m. (5:05 a.m. EST) today. This message never came. The Admiralty said it was possible unusual sunspot activity over the past two days might have blacked it out. Gigantic explosions on the sun have bombarded the earth with cosmic rays, interfering with communications. In Copenhagen, the Danish government's telegraph authority said no radio messages had been received from Greenland stations since yesterday "morning. "Frankly," a spokesman for the authority said, "we cannot see how a vessel could get signals through while we cannot receive a word from powerful land stations."

At 11:05 am. the Admiralty flashed the "sub-miss" signal alerting all ships, planes and rescue services—military ' and civilian—to stand by for possible help. An hour later a "sub-sunk" order was flashed—signalling an immediate search with all available ships and planes. Royal Air Force planes roared off for Reykjavik, Iceland, to set up a base for search operations. U.S. Air Force units on Iceland already were standing by. Ships steamed out from Scotland and Iceland. PDF


Climate Change

Front Page Headlines

11 comments:

  1. Yes.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_zfMyzXqfI

    ReplyDelete
  2. Credit "Wikipedia"????! You're kidding right!? Those lines all over the sky for over ten years have nothing to do with anything now, oh, its all the sun and sun spots? Please, I am going to vomit.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In 1967, I was ten, I knew then, as scientists the world over, contradicted the politicians, openly, the entire issue of "global cooling" was political, the notion "anthropomorphic climate change" was less likely by exponential factors, than "etymological based climate change", given there are ten times the mass of ants, on earth, than humans.
    The sun was at its hottest, when it spun off the planets, almost five billion years ago, only a few million years ago, was it cool enough for live to begin. It will never be as warm again on earth, as a general, long term thing, until the sun expands into a "red giant", at which point there will be no life in this solar system.
    All energy we have, comes directly from the sun, it is the sole source, not counting the odd particle which traverses our solar system, from "outer space", the "solar wind", keeping us isolated from the rest of our solar system, as well as "the rest of the universe". H.L. Mencken stated: "the purpose of popular politics, is to keep the populace constantly alarmed over imaginary hob-goblins, and clamoring for government to save them".
    CO2 is one hell of a gas, if in "300 parts per billion", it can completely change the climate, relative to the 78% nitrogen, 20% oxygen, 1.5% "other gases", not CO2, massively, while there have been times of life, when the CO2 was at 20%, yep, it was hotter, it was a million years ago, with dinosaurs, and plants made the planet green.
    No, "NASA" didn't know a damned thing, not then, not now, it is a meeting hall, where special people get to argue over facts versus fiction, and decide what the public will bite on.
    At ten, I knew "the Great Smokey Mountains", with the 100,000 year old fire burning through its coal seams, produced more CO2, each year, than man has produced since he began carrying coals of "natural fire" from one pit, to the next.
    I've lived through half a dozen volcano eruptions of major proportions in sixty years, and each has been stated to produce more "greenhouse gases" than "all of mankind, since we began carrying coals" by the volcanologists, and we've seen Mt. Pinatubo, halve the agricultural production for 2 years, and still impact it, seven years later.
    Mt. St. Helen's was "mitigated" by blowing the "gas bubble", in its cone's side, out, allowing 3/4ths of the energy dissipate against the ground, wiping out miles of forest, but saving millions of tons of debris being launched into the atmosphere, as Pinatubo did, making its effect last less than two years.
    If "they" were really worried about "global climate change", why would all the major powers be fighting over keeping access to oil, to continue to use it, while it exists?
    We could all have "Thorium nuclear power", with Thorium the most plentiful nuclear resource on earth, however it won't produce fissile material that can be used to make bombs, so they have stuck with light water reactors and uranium, to ensure plenty of nuclear bomb material.
    We, the U.S. would have easily achieved fusion power, had we spent the money in infrastructure, instead of war. We haven't invested in productivity since the end of the last world war, at the time, "we had all the world's money" having sold all the arms that fought the "western end of the war", for gold, or gold debt.
    We chose to "bank on oil", quite literally, unleash an entirely fiat currency, and abandon any legitimate accounting principles, for government and major corporations.
    Semper Fidelis,
    John McClain
    GySgt, USMC, ret.
    Vanceboro, NC, USA

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hawkeye, your arguments with me over the years have inspired me to look deeper into the reason our planet is in dire danger. I think the evidence I have put forward here actually proves geoengineering is irrelevant and is just mankind's final desperate effort to protect our world from the enormous power of the sun, the very reason our governments are spraying the sky is a futile last effort and is doomed to failure.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Immanuel Velikovsky knew the sun controlled Earth's climate in 1950, long before NASA thought about it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Geo engineering is probably the biggest single reason for our recent extreme climate issues. Why has it been such a covert issue the past decades. Solar radiation management or sky dimming has had an adverse affect on planet warming. The selective nano particles being dispersed does reflect the sun heat, however it a!so traps the heat under the toxic dome.
    Not saying this is the only issue of extreme climate. Include the technology of Raytheon using microwave and ionosphere heating to change erratic jet stream patterns. The patents are numerous if you would research them.
    Weather warfare is real and is contributing to our demise. Eisenhower warned us of the MIC. Their involvement in geo engineering and weather warfare is one huge reason, as it was being continually developed.
    Your research could have validity but is a dangerous concept to expound. Trump may well be using this theory to call climate change a hoax and continue to exploit fossils fuels, and strip away environmental protections. Or he really is an ignorant ass and doesn't care about anything but profits. Don't discount the negative effects geo engineering has produced.
    It is making our bad situation worse, even if your theory is correct.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thank you for your comments, someone, you at least make sense. I feel that people want to believe the info that frightens them and the children going through our education system are being taught to be scared about the planet’s climate.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I believe its geo engineering, not to help but to hasten our demise. I also believe either we are getting into the 7 years or tribulation has already started. I do not believe man is allowed to do anything God will not allow unless it fits His plans and His timing. The evil men ( call them masons or illuminati or whoever want to kill all but 500 million)
    Thank you Gary, my opinion is just that, my opinion. I appreciate your forum and hard work to get all the information out.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Douglas Vogt worked all this out years ago. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMr-5HHnAmU

    His conclusions are even more alarming!

    ReplyDelete